Monday, September 12, 2011

Ten Years Later, The Hidden Enemy Remains

Ten years ago, nineteen Muslim men hijacked four American airliners and used them as guided missiles, plunging them into the economic, military and symbolic hearts of America. Two flew into the World Trade Center towers, instantly killing all on board, killing hundreds more in the direct impact with the towers, and even more when the searing heat from the burning jet fuel weakened the structure of the buildings, bringing them crashing down on top of those trapped within. Additional American lives were lost when one of the airliners crashed into the Pentagon, and more when United Flight 93 crashed into a field in Pennsylvania, denying the terrorists a final victory.

In the days following the horrific attack by Muslim terrorists on 9/11, America was shaken to its knees. Thousands were dead, billions of dollars of damage done to property and, more importantly, the psyche of the American public had been bruised badly. We wondered how this could happen on American soil; how less than two dozen men using fake identification could’ve so badly hurt the world’s mightiest power. We lived in fear of when the next attack would occur.

As days turned to weeks, and weeks to months, the resilience and determination of the American people shone through the cloud of fear and sadness. Fear turned to anger and moral outrage at the atrocities waged against the American people. We went into Afghanistan and crippled the Taliban, which had aided and harbored the terrorists that had attacked us. Later we would turn our sites on Saddam Hussein, a brutal dictator who slaughtered tens of thousands of his own people, developed programs for weapons of mass destruction, and repeatedly defied U.N. Security Council resolutions and the terms of his surrender agreement that allowed him to retain power.

Ten years later, we must ask ourselves…are we safer? Despite harsh criticism from his political enemies (along with a heavy dose of selective memory and Monday morning quarterbacking), George W. Bush prevented another attack on the American homeland for the next eight years. His methods, especially the provisions of the PATRIOT Act, were constantly questioned and vilified as the resurrection of Nazi Sturmabteilung (‘stormtroopers”), the paramilitary “brown shirts” of Hitler’s Germany that instilled fear and terror in the citizenry. To be sure, many provisions were rightly questioned and, if implemented, demanded constant scrutiny to prevent abuse. Yet any attempts to protect us were the cause of wailing from an army of leftist Cassandras warning of impending doom.

The results of these actions were not so much the creation of an American Third Reich, but of a self-imposed, politically correct mass insanity of the American people, or at least their leadership. Despite the fact that, on 9/11 and in subsequent attempts, the perpetrators of terrorist attacks were young Muslim men, many named Muhammad, who came here from terrorist-supporting countries, it is considered uncouth to acknowledge those facts. It is considered racism or religious bigotry to vocalize the universally understood fact that it was not Jewish grandmothers, Swiss bankers, California surfers, middle class American businessmen, or moms with kids in tow that slaughtered our fellow Americans.

Instead, we engage in a ridiculous form of kabuki theater, mandating shoe removal to go through airport security, carrying no more than three ounces of liquid, and that nail clippers be confiscated from passengers (including an air marshal who was also carrying a loaded pistol, which he got to keep…apparently there was no fear of the air marshal shooting anyone, just that he might get bored and perform manicures without a license). We have the TSA perform physical searches so invasive that you can cancel your colonoscopy and mammogram and just take a flight to Des Moines instead. The TSA has also begun doing random searches on subways and bus terminals. In other words, we’ve given up tremendous freedom in exchange for the empty promise of safety.

As devastating as the attacks of 9/11 were, I never once feared America would fall to a bunch of Muslim extremists who. These are the enemies we could see, that we knew were trying to destroy us and that we could then prepare for and defend against. Yet, as Cicero warned, "An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself... A murderer is less to fear."

Today, the possibility of the collapse of the great American experiment lies not with Muslim terrorists, or even a resurgent Russia or the growing specter of a Communist Chinese superpower. No, if America falls it will not be by foreign hand, but by suicide. It will be because, through ignorance, jealousy, avarice or a lust for power, we let slip through our fingers the delicate threads of liberty. It will be because we wanted security more than freedom, and in the end were left with neither.

There is no hyperbole intended when I say that the greatest menace to the individual sovereignty enshrined in our Declaration of Independence and Constitution comes not from foreign invaders, but from those subverting our political system for their own gain.

We have a president and a major political party that have made it their mission to destroy the Constitution when it interferes with their agenda. President Obama refuses to enforce our immigration laws, and recently announced that only illegal aliens that engage in felonies will be prosecuted. He has signed a health care reform bill that removes the last vestiges of federalism and eliminates any remaining constraint on the federal government in its effort to control the lives of its citizens. President Obama and his party, after lambasting President George W. Bush for accumulating $4 trillion in debt in eight years, have accumulated nearly $5 trillion in less than three years. The burden of this crushing debt will fall largely on future generations, making them economic slaves before they even leave the womb.

When an organic uprising of millions of ordinary American citizens occurred, citizens previously uninvolved in political activism but now frightened at the rapidity with which we were propelling ourselves to become a socialist welfare state, Obama called them the “enemy”. His speeches are replete with calls for his supporters to battle those who demand lower spending, lower taxes and limited, constitutional government. He’s told his supporters to “get in [our] faces”, and to engage in “hand to hand combat”. Last weekend, AFL-CIO labor union president James Hoffa told a huge crowd of union workers to fight the TEA Party, telling them to “take the son of a b**ches out”. Obama spoke shortly after that to the same assembled crowd, and not only did not rebuke such inflammatory language, he actually said how proud he was to be associated with the union leaders and members. His Vice President, Joe Biden, at a separate event, referred to Republicans and TEA Partiers as “barbarians” that must be “kept from the gate”. This is nothing less than an incitement to violence, a proclivity which we’ve already seen in union thugs.

Ten years after the 9/11 attack, there is still a danger of America collapsing. However, it will not come from Muslim terrorists (though they will surely attempt to hurt us), but from a government kleptocracy intent on permanently subjecting its citizens to economic slavery, and making enemies of those that fight to restore individual freedom and constitutional government. May we all fight valiantly protect the rights of our neighbors as much as for ourselves. In doing so, we will purge the enemy from within and restore America’s vision of liberty.

4 comments:

  1. You write this post with a lot of wicked pride. We did not need to go into Iraq since the bad guys who attacked us didn't come from that country. We killed the real bad guy with President Obama as our Commander-in-chief. Give it a rest.

    ReplyDelete
  2. CTR,
    You show as much knowledge and intelligence with this comment as you have with the others; which is to say, not much. I'll not go into a lengthy exposition here (you can do your own research for a change), but there were numerous reasons to invade Iraq, which is why Democrats such as Joe Biden, Joe Lieberman, Hillary Clinton, Jane Harman (on the Intelligence Committee, and therefore having the exact same access to intelligence data as Bush), and dozens of others voted to authorize the use of force against Hussein.

    As far as Obama, the credit he gets for killing Osama begins and ends with his authorization to send the SEAL team in. The groundwork for all of that was laid under Bush, as evidenced by the train of intelligence that led us to that point.

    I don't mind criticism of my positions, I would just like it to be informed. Can you try that for me, as opposed to just making random assertions unsubstantiated by fact?

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's interesting how you fail to see clear things. We went into Iraq for one reason only in regards to WMD. After going in we never found the WMD which is why every person you named about said they would not have given permission to go in the first place. Even Powell said he would not give the thumbs up with what we know know.

    As far as taking out OBL it was not Bush who put us down that road since his focus was all on Iraq. You fail to clearly see that Obama didn't have a 100% intelligence that OBL was at the location. It was a risk to go in, but he showed leadership by giving the go ahead. You don't have to cry because it happened under Obama. watch. I would have been just as happy if it happened under Bush. I'm more interested in the principle than the political.

    Again, you try to paint me as some idiot, but it is your pride that keeps you from seeing what is clear to most people.

    ReplyDelete
  4. CTR,
    You've apparently accepted the revisionist history painted by the media, but if you go back and look at the documents and news reports at the time, you'll see you are mistaken in many of your assumptions. You mention that Powell would not have given the "thumbs up" to go into Iraq with what we know now. Exactly...with what we know NOW. Bush and the Democrats made that decision based on the intelligence available at the time. Once we discovered that much of the intelligence was either outdated or faulty, the Democrats jumped ship and pretended like they were lied to, and feigned moral outrage. That is not leadership, that is politically expedient cowardice.

    I don't think you are an idiot, but I do think you are ignorant. You continue to make comments based on false premises. The information we got that led us to OBL was, by the military's own admission, the result of intelligence efforts put in place about 6-7 years ago, long before Obama took office. I'm glad he gave the okay and said so at the time, but authorizing a single mission does not undo the damage done by many of his other anti-terrorism policies. If he gets credit for OBL, then he also deserves responsibility for the Fort Hood massacre and the numerous attempted attacks under his watch. You can't have it both ways.

    I'm also not concerned about seeing what is "clear to most people". At one time it was "clear to most people" that the Earth was flat, that the universe was geocentric, and that there were four elements of nature. They were all wrong. I am more interested in truth than consensus.

    ReplyDelete